Close

Keywords:

What is the exploitation status of fisheries resources in the Gulf of California?

The periodic assessments on the health of fish stocks is important in order to design and implement management measures to maintain sustainable fisheries. The status of a fishery is usually determined by using two metrics: (1) the total weight of fish underwater (or biomass) and (2) the fishing effort. These metrics are then compared to the reference level known as the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY), which is the level of exploitation at which the fishery can generate the maximum amount of fish per year. The health of a fish stock can be reported by using a system of four categories. When biomass is high and effort is low, the fishery is sustainable. When biomass and effort are high, the fishery is overexploited. When biomass is low and effort is high, the fishery is collapsed. Finally, when biomass and effort are low, the fishery is recovering from overexploitation.

image description

Traditionally, estimating the total biomass and effort in a fishery is done through data intensive methods, which require extensive samplings both derived from fishing boats and from scientific expeditions. These assessments are expensive to perform, thus limiting the number of species that could be periodically assessed, and often being performed primarily for species of high commercial importance. We use a new method that does not require such extensive data to estimate the stock status for the artisanal fisheries in the Gulf of California (1). This method works by using only the official national fisheries landings reported to CONAPESCA from 2001 to 2016 (2). To increase our precision, we also incorporate estimates of Illegal Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) catch and historical landings as reported to FAO (3).

We divided the Gulf of California in 11 sub-regions to separate different stocks of similar species because although the same species could live in two sub-regions, the populations will mostly stay geographically separated throughout the year. For this study, we only evaluated the fisheries that represented 95% of the total revenues per subregion, accounting for a total of 121 fishery stocks.

Major findings:

In 2016, out of the 121 fisheries stocks analyzed in the Gulf of California, 69% were collapsed, 11% were overexploited, 13% were recovering, and 7% were sustainable. Overall, 82% of the stocks had a biomass below the MSY, and 80% were subject to unsustainable fishing efforts. Notably, in 5 years (2012-2016), the biomass of 61% of the stocks decreased and the effort increased for 65% of them. This means that in future years, if no active regulations are applied to preserve fishery resources, more stocks will collapse and be subjected to unsustainable fishing pressure.

Our results provide the first systematic stock assessment for a wide range of artisanal fisheries in the Gulf of California. This is an important first step towards generating a system of fisheries assessments that could be extended to the rest of the country and updated every year as new landings data become available.

 


  1. Froese R, Demirel N, Coro G, Kleisner KM, Winker H. Estimating fisheries reference points from catch and resilience. Fish Fish. 2017;18: 506–526. doi:10.1111/faf.12190

  2. Ramírez-Valdez A, Johnson AF, Giron-Nava A, Aburto-Oropeza O. Mexico’s national fishery statistics. DataMares. InteractiveResource. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.13022/M3MW2P

  3. Giron-Nava A, Johnson AF, Cisneros-Montemayor, Andrés M., Aburto-Oropeza O. Managing at Maximum Sustainable Yield does not ensure economic well-being for artisanal fishers. Fish Fish. 2018; 1–10. doi:10.1111/faf.12332